Poll: What are your thoughts on zone-advance costs?
Woodcutting AP cost is too high
Mining AP cost is too high
Woodcutting Gold cost is too high
Woodcutting Gold cost is too low
Woodcutting Gold cost is fine
Mining log cost is too high
Mining log cost is too low
Mining log cost is fine
Woodcutting AP cost is fine
Mining AP cost is fine
[Show Results]
 
Note: This is a public poll, other users will be able to see what you voted for.
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Mining and Woodcutting Zone-Advance Costs
#7
I think the current AP costs (for zone progress) are fine - Wood and Stone have significant value now. Wood zones end up being more limited by total wood warmed over the gold cost of advancing, and mining depths are dictated by wood costs over AP. This allows for deeper progress to slow down unless people focus ascension points (and active play) towards these sub-systems over combat.

The only area that's a bit crazy for its costs would be the +max NRG upgrades for woodcutting/mining, it feels like it costs scale too fast for a linear +max NRG, which makes taking the +1 NRG regen option force more active play to net a benefit from it.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Mining and Woodcutting Zone-Advance Costs - Omnia0001 - 06-24-2015, 05:09 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)