09-12-2015, 05:46 AM
There a lot of immediate problems with this that I like to point out.
For starters paying gold just for protection seems pointless to me, if you going to lose, you gonna lose. Plus that gold is better kept so they can actually develop, its very necessary past 200 and without that gold, they will never get better, rather they continue to get weaker as all other guilds that don't do this will prove to become significantly stronger.
The mechanics needs to make it so it still possible to attack smaller guilds but only those within a certain range, where if the guilds are higher, there is no limit to how far you like to go for a challenge.
The fact members needs to online already skews this features, this mean any guild that keeps primarily 24/7 players will have a significant advantage over those that have players that can't always be on.
Not trying to dismiss the idea, I just think that if you going to use a GvG system, it needs a bit of balancing, it needs to keep all play styles in mind.
For starters paying gold just for protection seems pointless to me, if you going to lose, you gonna lose. Plus that gold is better kept so they can actually develop, its very necessary past 200 and without that gold, they will never get better, rather they continue to get weaker as all other guilds that don't do this will prove to become significantly stronger.
The mechanics needs to make it so it still possible to attack smaller guilds but only those within a certain range, where if the guilds are higher, there is no limit to how far you like to go for a challenge.
The fact members needs to online already skews this features, this mean any guild that keeps primarily 24/7 players will have a significant advantage over those that have players that can't always be on.
Not trying to dismiss the idea, I just think that if you going to use a GvG system, it needs a bit of balancing, it needs to keep all play styles in mind.