(12-02-2015, 09:12 AM)brutalboy Wrote:(12-02-2015, 09:03 AM)vosavo Wrote: Fairly certain only 'swears' are censored, what's the need not to censor them?
taking inspiration from your signature and considering only those 'swears' you are talking about:
censorship = no fun
but seriously, we had problems in normal communication because of that, how can you make distinction between **** and **** written in the same sentence?
I guess you have a point, i'd remain undecided as the hole concept of what's under the **** is most likely not necessary, but usually you can make the distinction depending on the rest of the sentence. Is there any words that shouldn't be censored that are?
-Though I tested it, seems like there's still a lot that COULD be censored.-
Also if there's an option added like this, the filter should (will) be much stricter.
But if an option is added to decide on censorship or not, what would be the point of having the filter in the first place though? I doubt anyone would bother having it on, unless it was by default. I'd think of either having the filter or not having it at all.